In the closing weeks of the campaign, Vice President Al Gore is making the case that a vote for Nader is a vote for George W. Bush. In dozens of rallies in battleground states such as Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, Gore, his political allies and friends in the entertainment industry, have tried to win back disaffected Nader voters with the warning that casting a ballot for the Greens could usher in a Bush presidency -- endangering a woman's right to choose and federal policies on the environment, education and social security.
In the final lap of this election, Republicans are sensing victory and many have bent over backwards to lavish praise on Mr. Nader. GOP allies in fact have spent over $100,000 in the final week of the campaign to buy TV ads in Washington, Wisconsin and Oregon, which feature a portion of a Nader speech attacking Gore's environmental record. Their ad of course, leaves out a section of that same speech which assails George Bush "as a big corporation running for president, disguised as a person."
While some Green Party activists are defiant, stressing that a Gore defeat would provide a shock to the system that some feel is necessary to start the process of cleaning up the corruption of corporate dominated politics, other Nader supporters are advocating strategic voting -- casting a vote for the Greens only in the 40 states where the contest is already over.
Once ignored by the corporate media and the major parties, Ralph Nader and his supporters may now be pivotal in deciding who will win or lose the White House Nov. 7.
Between The Lines presents a debate on the merits of Nader's Green Party candidacy. Supporting Ralph Nader is Dr. Manning Marable, professor of history and political science and director of the Institute for Research in African American studies at Columbia University. Cathy Hurwit, who has endorsed Vice President Gore, is chief of staff for Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, Democrat in Illinois, Hurwit worked with Citizen Action for 12 years advocating progressive policies on health care, energy and the environment.
Despite his exclusion from the nationally televised candidate debates, Nader was drawing about five percent of the vote, according to opinion polls at the close of the campaign. Because the margin of victory or defeat is so small in many critical states, the left has been imbued with newfound power to influence this year's presidential contest. Progressives by and large have taken this responsibility quite seriously -- some going so far as to launch sophisticated Internet sites where citizens in states solidly for Gore or Bush can trade votes with worried Nader supporters in the so-called battleground states.
Between The Lines' Scott Harris spoke with John Nichols, an editor at the Capitol Times in Madison, Wis., and a columnist with the Nation magazine, who assess Nader's candidacy's influence on progressive politics in the years ahead..
John Nichols writes "The Beat" column for the Nation magazine, which can be found at www.thenation.com
... MORE ...
Between The Lines/WPKN Radio Pre-Election Issue Forums:
Growing Economic Inequality, The Failed Drug War & Prison Industrial Complex
Progressives Debate: Will Nader's Candidacy Shock the System Leftward or Revive Reagan-Era Politics?
Issues the Major Parties Agree on and Therefore Refuse to Debate
Resources
"CEO/Worker Pay Gap: The Neglected Campaign Issue"
"Divided Decade: Economic Disparity at the Century's Turn"
THIS WEEK'S PROGRAM
LISTEN to this week's half-hour program of Between The Lines by clicking here or any of the individual interview segments below (All in RealAudio, needs RealPlayer 7 or 8.)
This week we present Between The Lines' summary of under-reported news stories and:
Moderated by Scott Harris.
Interview by Scott Harris.
Compiled by Bob Nixon and Rich Fraser