Award-winning investigative journalist and founder/editor of ConsortiumNews.com, Robert Parry has passed away. His ground-breaking work uncovering Reagan-era dirty wars in Central America and many other illegal and immoral policies conducted by successive administrations and U.S. intelligence agencies, stands as an inspiration to all in journalists working in the public interest.
Robert had been a regular guest on our Between The Lines and Counterpoint radio shows -- and many other progressive outlets across the U.S. over four decades.
His penetrating analysis of U.S. foreign policy and international conflicts will be sorely missed, and not easily replaced. His son Nat Parry writes a tribute to his father: Robert Parry’s Legacy and the Future of Consortiumnews.
If you've made a donation and wish to receive thank you gifts for your donation, be sure to send us your mailing address via our Contact form.
See our thank you gifts for your donation.
Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement
Selected speeches from the Women's March in Hartford, Connecticut 2018, recorded and produced by Scott Harris
Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.
Subscribe to our Weekly Summary & receive our FREE Resist Trump window cling
Email us with your mailing address at contact@btlonline.org to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!
who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!
For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video
Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 1 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.
Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 2 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.
"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.
Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.
Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.
Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live,
weekly talk show,
Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines'
interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m.
EDT at www.WPKN.org
(Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)
Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET
Monday nights,
and is available for at least a year following broadcast in
WPKN Radio's Archives.
You can also listen to
full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which
are generally available some time the day following broadcast.
Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.
"The Rogue World Order: Connecting the Dots Between Trump, Flynn, Bannon, Spencer, Dugin Putin," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Feb. 13, 2017
"Widespread Resistance Begins to Trump's Muslim Travel Ban at U.S. Airports," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 28, 2017
"MSNBC Editor: Women's March is a Revival of the Progressive Movement," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 24, 2017
"Cornering Trump," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 19, 2017
"Free Leonard Peltier," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 6, 2016
"For Natives, a "Day of Mourning"by Reginald Johnson, November 23, 2016
"A Bitter Harvest" by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 15, 2016
A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view
Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed
If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.
Learn how to support our efforts!
Interview with Chris Toensing, editor of the Middle East Report, conducted by Melinda Tuhus
The latest round of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians began just a month ago and are now on hold because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu let a partial one-time nine-month building freeze in the occupied West Bank expire. The Palestinians stated at the outset they would not continue negotiations unless the freeze is extended.
President Obama has promised millions of dollars in additional aid and more security guarantees for Israel if it extends the freeze for just one month, but as yet that has not happened. Netanyahu's latest ploy is to demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state -- something their negotiators have always refused to do -- possibly hoping to pin the blame on them for the failure of the talks. He has also thrown his support behind a demand by his right-wing coalition partners to require non-Jews wishing to become Israeli citizens to sign a loyalty oath to Israel as a "Jewish, democratic state."
Between The Lines' Melinda Tuhus spoke with Chris Toensing, editor of Middle East Report, about the current state of negotiations, the role of the U.S., and what may offer hope for a just solution to the long term conflict.
CHRIS TOENSING: You know, unfortunately, probably, people who look back on this experiment will see it as a replay of the Clinton-sponsored peace process of the 1990s, just telescoped into a much shorter time. And the core reason for what I expect to be the failure of this exercise will be the same, which is that the U.S. was unable/unwillling to act as a genuinely honest broker and caved in to Israel's negotiating position its own, and made Israel's negotiating position its own, and as a result made the entire process a non-starter. I agree with you about what Netanyahu has done; it's being portrayed as a sop to the right flank in his Cabinet as a way of getting his cabinet to endorse an extension of the moratorium on settlement building that was honored in the breach this past year. It may be that, but it's also a hurdle that he knows the Palestinians cannot jump over, and thus a way to shift the blame onto the Palestinians if, as seems to be the case, these talks collapse, and leaves the Obama administration holding the bag and looking pretty silly, since they came into office saying a freeze on settlement building in the West Bank was an absolute pre-condition of getting meaningful peace talks started, and they caved in, and now they can't even get a partial temporary freeze on settlement building even while the talks are ongoing.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Chris Toensing, I'm sure you're aware that George W. Bush was probably the most popular US president ever in Israel, and Obama is the most unpopular. Israelis feel like he's demanding all these things, but in reality the package he offered Netanyahu to get him to extend the partial freeze for 30 days was extremely generous. What did he offer the Palestinians?
CHRIS TOENSING: Well, they reportedly offered the Palestinians a pledge to endorse the idea of a Palestinian state on all the lands occupied by Israel in 1967. That would have been a significant statement on the part of the US, since in recent years the US has shown considerable ambiguity on that point. They have ceased mentioning the idea that Israel needs to withdraw from all the territories occupied in 1967.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Does it include East Jerusalem?
CHRIS TOENSING: Jerusalem was not specified in the reports I saw, but that would seem to be included in a Palestinian state based on the '67 lines.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Hasn't that been proposed for years?
CHRIS TOENSING: Well, it's totally new that that would be tied with a Palestinian state in explicit terms. These are only press reports; we don't know what the actual wording would have been; there was no public wording. But if you remember that UN resolution 242 was not just voted for but drafted by the US, the UN ambassador at the time of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. This was a US position that Israel needed to withdraw from all of the territories occupied in '67 as a precondition of a just and comprehensive peace in the Arab/Israeli situation. In theory, yes, it would be a fairly significant restatement of a historical US position from which the Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush administrations dramatically retreated.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Do you think the BDS Movement -- boycott, divestment and sanctions -- holds any hope for influencing the peace process? It seems to be growing, however slowly.
CHRIS TOENSING: It is gaining traction, yes, among activist communities, who, it must be stated, are small -- tiny in many places. But that's where the energy is, that's for sure. There's more energy there than there is in the peace process industry trying to promote a two-state solution as classically envisioned, so it does seem to be the wave of the future in those terms. I think the more thoughtful proponents of BDS are quite honest and clear-headed about the fact that BDS is a very long-term strategy. The wallop that that strategy would pack -- w hich I think Israel understands very well -- is it would not be the sort of thing where boycotts would economically cripple the occupation or economically cripple Israel -- certainly not. But the idea would be to delegitimize what Israel is doing in policies toward the Palestinians to the extent that other countries would think twice about doing business with Israel, so in other words, the idea would be to have this secondary effect, that you would isolate Israel economically, diplomatically, culturally, etc. But for that process to take place would take a long time.
And it's very important to remember, I think, that the comparison with apartheid in South Africa is tempting, and there are many parallels that are accurate, but there are also many things that are very different, and one thing that is crucially different is that you did not have in Europe and the US in the 1980s a vocal, Afrikaaner, pro-apartheid lobby which was fighting back against the BDS movement trying to get rid of apartheid in South Africa, whereas you do have -- in the US in particular -- a very vocal, well organized pro-Israel lobby.
And another crucial difference, which should not be minimized, is that there was no ambient demonization in political culture of South African blacks like there is ambient demonization of Arabs and Muslims in western culture because of the image of Arabs and Muslims as terrorists who hate the West, and so on.
Contact the Middle East Report, a publication of the Middle East Research and Information Project at their Washington, D.C. office at (202) 223-3677 or visit their website at www.merip.org
Related links: