Award-winning investigative journalist and founder/editor of ConsortiumNews.com, Robert Parry has passed away. His ground-breaking work uncovering Reagan-era dirty wars in Central America and many other illegal and immoral policies conducted by successive administrations and U.S. intelligence agencies, stands as an inspiration to all in journalists working in the public interest.
Robert had been a regular guest on our Between The Lines and Counterpoint radio shows -- and many other progressive outlets across the U.S. over four decades.
His penetrating analysis of U.S. foreign policy and international conflicts will be sorely missed, and not easily replaced. His son Nat Parry writes a tribute to his father: Robert Parry’s Legacy and the Future of Consortiumnews.
If you've made a donation and wish to receive thank you gifts for your donation, be sure to send us your mailing address via our Contact form.
See our thank you gifts for your donation.
Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement
Selected speeches from the Women's March in Hartford, Connecticut 2018, recorded and produced by Scott Harris
Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.
Subscribe to our Weekly Summary & receive our FREE Resist Trump window cling
Email us with your mailing address at contact@btlonline.org to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!
who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!
For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video
Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 1 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.
Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 2 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.
"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.
Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.
Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.
Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live,
weekly talk show,
Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines'
interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m.
EDT at www.WPKN.org
(Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)
Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET
Monday nights,
and is available for at least a year following broadcast in
WPKN Radio's Archives.
You can also listen to
full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which
are generally available some time the day following broadcast.
Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.
A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view
Podcasts: direct or via iTunes
Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed
If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.
Learn how to support our efforts!
Tweets by @BTLRadioNewsPosted Dec. 27, 2017
Interview with Jon Rainwater, executive director of the group Peace Action, conducted by Scott Harris
Before the Christmas holiday, there was a brief sign of hope that dangerous rising tensions between the Trump administration and North Korea might be about to ease. On Dec. 12, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson issued the following statement at the Atlantic Council in Washington: "We've said from the diplomatic side, we're ready to talk anytime North Korea would like to talk. We are ready to have the first meeting without precondition.” Tillerson’s comments were uncharacteristically conciliatory toward Pyongyang, given the fact that during his first speech at the United Nations in September President Trump had threatened to “totally destroy North Korea.”
But not long after Tillerson’s overture to the North, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump’s position on North Korea was unchanged and that negotiations were pointless if the North’s leader, Kim Jong-un, continued to menace his neighbors. The disconnect between Tillerson and the White House exposed ongoing public disagreements in the administration on the proper U.S. approach to North Korea. The discord also focused renewed attention on reports that the administration was considering a plan to replace Tillerson at the State Department with CIA Director Mike Pompeo and fill the vacancy at the CIA with conservative Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas.
Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Jon Rainwater, executive director of the group Peace Action, who assesses the mixed signals sent by the Trump administration on beginning negotiations with North Korea with the goal of de-escalating tensions over Pyongyang's nuclear weapons and missile program.
JON RAINWATER: There have been rising tensions. We're closer to war with North Korea than we ever have been on both sides, particularly the two heads of state have been engaging in the most egregious sort of language towards each other. And Tillerson did recently make a statement in a speech that he was willing to negotiate. That the United States was willing to negotiate and he used the words without preconditions. And this very welcome.
It was actually the dropping of preconditions in negotiations with Iran that led to the breakthrough of starting to talk to Iran that in turn led to the breakthrough of having the nuclear agreement with Iran. People may remember that George W. Bush had put on a precondition with Iran to require Iran to end enrichment of uranium and that did not work very well. During that entire period, Iran just went ahead with its program and created more and more uranium, more lower-enriched uranium, much of it, but they did not listen to the preconditions. So those type of preconditions don't work.
Tillerson came to the table, so to speak, although it was in a speech saying we could drop preconditions. Now, he left some wiggle room, and then in a subsequent statement, he talked about making sure that there's an end to missile tests before getting to the table, which sounds an awful lot like a pre-condition. So we are getting a mixed message not only from the administration as a whole, but with Tillerson himself. So it's a little disappointing, but at least he's pointing to this opening, so we have to push the administration to really engage in direct talks.
BETWEEN THE LINES: Do we have any indication of what exactly the conflict is between the White House and Tillerson at the State Department?
JON RAINWATER: I think some of it is just on atmospherics and posturing, because a lot of it is going to happen behind closed doors. So you have a situation again with Iran where the Obama administration started reaching out to counterparts in Iran to set up negotiations. And some of that work is apparently happening. Or something analogous is happening with North Korea where there is some at least lower level contacts. So, knowing exactly where the president is at is hard to say. You've seen a lot of these tweets by the president criticizing, in a sense, diplomacy that Tillerson is engaging in. You have a lot of aggressive tweets basically downplaying diplomacy and so, clearly there are those in the administration that don't yet want to drop preconditions and there's some kind of tug of war going on with the State Department.
But I certainly don't know exactly who's where within those debates.
BETWEEN THE LINES: John, what concerns do you have about the coming period? There's a lot of commentators who talk about the Russia investigation targeting the inner circle of Trump in the White House and the president himself may be charged with one crime or another related to collusion between his campaign and Russia. Is there a concern that in the "wag-the-dog" style we might see more bellicose rhetoric targeting North Korea? And the conceivable triggering of a conflict that would, in effect be a way to distract the American people from the scandal-plagued White House and where the Mueller investigation may be headed?
JON RAINWATER: I think the wag-the-dog scenario is very real and something we should be very concerned about. I'm hopeful that the attention that everybody's giving it, I mean, the fact that that's one of your big questions means that people will be ready for it. And ready to say, "Wait a second, you're just trying to distract us here. We can't have war with North Korea."
So I think we have to demand diplomacy now before it gets to that state. And if the administration starts talking about war, we as the public need to put pressure on our members of Congress to push back.
For more information, visit Peace Action's website at peaceaction.org.
Related Links: